三星Galaxy Z Fold 6 评测--配备 S Pen 的防尘可折叠智能手机性能大打折扣昨天的技术？ Galaxy Z Fold6 是首款通过 IP48 认证的 XXL 可折叠手机。不过，它似乎错过了如今可折叠手机领域明显的纤薄趋势。在这篇评测中，你可以发现这款三星手机是否仍然值得购买。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 08/20/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 5G Foldable Smart Home
今年，三星再次忠实于该系列，其Galaxy Z Fold6 与前代机型相比只做了极少的改进。 Z Fold6 的改进微乎其微。其精巧的重新设计风格与 Galaxy S24 Ultra的风格进行了微妙的重新设计，为这款可折叠手机配备了稍宽的显示屏和更坚固的外壳。除此以外，Z Fold6 并无太大变化，三星似乎想把真正的大变化保留给 超的可折叠系列。
即便如此，Fold6 的价格还是略有上涨。进入 Fold 6 的世界需要花费 1,899.99 美元。在三星商店之外，有 256 GB 和 512 GB 两种存储容量可供选择，三星还直接提供 1 TB 的选择。
Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Galaxy Z Fold6 Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy 8 x 2.3 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 750Memory12 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay7.60 inch 10.47:9, 2160 x 1856 pixel 375 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB , 460 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, UWB-Chip, Miracast, Samsung DeX, S PenNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 5.6 x 153.5 x 132.6Battery4400 mAh Lithium-PolymerChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm) + 10 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 66 mm) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, 12 mm), camera2 API: Level 3Secondary Camera: 4 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm) + Cover Screen 10 MPix (f/2.2, 24 mm)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, SIM tool, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP48; Widevine L1, SAR value - 1.242W/kg Head, 1.391W/kg Body, SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SCC, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5), Beidou (B1, B2), fanless, waterproofWeight239 g
Price2119 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingVersionDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionPrice
86.1 %v808 / 2024Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2160x1856
88.8 %v7 (old)v7 (old)05 / 2024Vivo X Fold3SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740219 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash8.03"2480x2200
89.1 %v7 (old)v7 (old)02 / 2024Honor Magic V2 RSRSD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740234 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash7.92"2344x2156
87.3 %v7 (old)v7 (old)11 / 2023Xiaomi Mix Fold 3SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740259 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.03"2160x1916
89.1 %v7 (old)v7 (old)08 / 2023Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740253 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2176x1812
请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
保护套 -Galaxy Z Fold6，具有 IP 保护等级
Galaxy Z Fold6 的颜色选择Galaxy Z Fold6 不仅比 Z Fold5 更薄、更轻，而且比 Z Fold6 更轻。 折叠5还更加棱角分明和对称。在折叠状态下，手机外壳纤薄了 1.3 毫米，轻了 14 克。毋庸置疑，我们认可三星对 XXL 可折叠手机的进一步开发，但Galaxy 机型的紧凑程度远不及来自中国的竞争对手，如 vivo X Fold3.Fold6 的显示屏折叠也比中国制造商的折叠手机要突出得多。三星称，为了更好地抵御外界影响，折叠边缘经过了不同程度的加固和涂层处理。
与前代产品的 IPx8 认证相比，Fold6 新的 IP48 防护等级名义上具有更强的防护能力。这意味着大于 1 毫米的灰尘颗粒不再对折叠屏构成威胁。现在，该设备的正面和背面都采用了大猩猩胜利女神 2 号玻璃，而外壳仍然是铠甲铝合金材质。这款手机的制造质量非常出色。其超紧无级挠性铰链也让人感觉优质耐用。
尺寸比较
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Vivo X Fold3 Honor Magic V2 RSR Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 DIN A6 ❌
尺寸比较
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Vivo X Fold3 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Honor Magic V2 RSR Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 DIN A6 ❌
连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 的三星智能手机Galaxy Z Fold6 有三种不同的存储版本可供选择，它们都提供了全面的功能，包括蓝牙 5.3、USB OTG、NFC、UWB 芯片、Miracast 和 Samsung DeX。三星可折叠手机还采用了快速 USB 标准（3.2 Gen.1），支持将有线图像输出到 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口。在我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2.SSD 硬盘）进行的复制测试中，USB 端口的传输速率达到了 224 MB/s。连接的存储介质可格式化为 NTFS（只读）或 exFAT。
软件 - 更新时间长的Galaxy 手机Galaxy Z Fold6 预装了Android 14 和三星内部操作系统 One UI 6.1。得益于三星和谷歌之间的独家合作关系，谷歌双子座应用被集成到了系统中，并可使用 "圈到搜索 "功能。 Galaxy 从 Galaxy S24 Ultra也可以使用。在测试时，三星可折叠手机的操作系统采用了 2024 年 6 月的安全补丁。
可持续性三星在其Galaxy Z Fold6 中使用了可回收材料。除了再生塑料、钴、铝和玻璃，它还使用了再生金和铜。其包装也完全由再生纸制成。由于不含充电器，包装体积更小、重量更轻，这意味着运输过程中产生的废气排放量更少。包装盒采用大豆油墨印刷。
软件更新方面的长期支持是三星手机的一大亮点。七代操作系统的升级和七年的安全更新确实是非常可持续的。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Z Fold6 with WiFi 6EGalaxy 可折叠手机支持当前所有的移动通信标准和包括 5G Sub6 在内的各种频率。在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中，Fold6 仍然不支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7，但与 折叠5一样，它支持 ax 标准。使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为参考路由器，我们的测试设备显示，在 6 GHz 频段内发送数据时，传输速率相对较低。
NetworkingSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 iperf3 receive AXE11000
761 (min: 683) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
531 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
770 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1365 (min: 1221) MBit/s ∼83%
Vivo X Fold3 iperf3 receive AXE11000
946 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
980 (min: 882) MBit/s ∼99%
Honor Magic V2 RSR iperf3 receive AXE11000
772 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
932 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1867 (min: 1829) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 iperf3 receive AXE11000
886 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
924 (min: 456) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1631 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1601 (min: 1511) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 receive AXE11000
744 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1349 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1408 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø757 (402-836) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1075-1812) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1363 (1221-1406) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1511-1667) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø759 (683-800) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø884 (764-954) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø522 (263-608) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (456-950)
室内定位
户外定位与我们的对比设备 Garmin Venu 2 相比，我们测试样本的定位服务证明非常出色。部分归功于其双频全球导航卫星系统，Fold6 只显示出与我们实际路线的微小偏差。
Galaxy Z Fold6 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
电话功能和通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 的三星智能手机
三星智能手机通过两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽和/或两个 eSIM 配置文件提供全面的双卡支持。它的通话质量非常好，语音再现清晰。还支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话以及实时翻译。
相机 -Galaxy Z Fold6，5000 万像素使用 400 万像素摄像头自拍
使用 10 百万像素镜头自拍与往年一样，三星在手机主显示屏下隐藏了一个 400 万像素的摄像头。您还可以使用安装在外显示屏上的 1000 万像素冲孔镜头进行自拍。这两个摄像头都不支持自动对焦，而且只有外置摄像头能提供 UHD 画质的视频。不过，如果你准备好了合适的存储位置，打开主摄像头和前面板时就可以将其用作取景器。
与 Fold5 相比，第六代的后置摄像头系统也没有太大的变化。 折叠 5甚至 折叠 4.它的 5000 万像素主摄像头仍然以其强大的动态范围和良好的锐度给我们留下了深刻的印象。即使在弱光环境下，Fold6 也能提供良好的照度，没有明显的柔焦现象。其色彩还原同样令人印象深刻。
0.6x
1x
5x
10x
30 倍（最大值）Galaxy Z Fold6 的超广角镜头和 1000 万像素长焦摄像头都达到了可折叠手机的良好效果。在纸面上拥有更好摄像头的可折叠手机，如 Honor Magic V2-在日常使用中的照片效果明显较差。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angleLow lightUltra-wide angleZoom 5xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Honor Magic V2Google Pixel 8 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Honor Magic V2Google Pixel 8 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Honor Magic V2Google Pixel 8 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Honor Magic V2Google Pixel 8 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Honor Magic V2Google Pixel 8 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
1.2 ∆E3.8 ∆E4.5 ∆E2.6 ∆E3.1 ∆E4.5 ∆E2.1 ∆E4.8 ∆E3.4 ∆E6.1 ∆E3 ∆E1.9 ∆E5.9 ∆E2.6 ∆E2.1 ∆E1.4 ∆E2.5 ∆E8.8 ∆E5.3 ∆E1.7 ∆E2.4 ∆E1.8 ∆E2.6 ∆E4.9 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6: 3.46 ∆E min: 1.22 - max: 8.76 ∆E22.4 ∆E37 ∆E29.9 ∆E25 ∆E32.6 ∆E46.6 ∆E33.7 ∆E22.7 ∆E26 ∆E21.5 ∆E41.1 ∆E43.8 ∆E19.3 ∆E32.1 ∆E19.9 ∆E37.8 ∆E28.9 ∆E35.2 ∆E35.5 ∆E38.3 ∆E38 ∆E29.9 ∆E21.9 ∆E13 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6: 30.5 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 46.6 ∆E
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
配件和保修 - 不带电源的可折叠手机Galaxy Z Fold 6 的可选配件手机的供货范围不包括电源适配器或保护套，但包括数据线或充电线（USB-C 至 USB-C）和 SIM 卡工具。三星为 Fold6 提供了大量可供选择的配套保护套。S Pen 也必须单独购买。
只要是在美国购买的三星手机，都享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。此外，购买 Fold6 还可享受一年免费 Care+。
输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的三星智能手机三星智能手机外部的 6.3 英寸 OLED 面板和内部的 7.6 英寸主显示屏刷新率高达 120 Hz，因此可以快速响应并流畅显示内容。由于采用了迄今为止可折叠手机中最好的铰链设计，手机在部分展开状态下几乎可以在任何角度实现柔性模式。此外，支持手写笔也是Galaxy Z Fold 系列的一大特色。遗憾的是，三星未能为 Fold6 现在更宽的外部显示屏提供 S-Pen 兼容性，而这在日常使用中肯定会非常有用。
电源键上集成了指纹传感器，它能非常可靠地解锁三星手机。用户还可以通过前置摄像头和显示屏下方的摄像头使用安全性较低的 2D 面部识别系统。在这个价格范围内，它的线性振动电机（X 轴）清晰而精确。
显示屏 -Galaxy 配备可折叠屏幕的手机 OLED 显示屏基于 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色发光二极管组成。在我们的测试中，Galaxy Z Fold6 的主显示屏达到了 2,778 cd/m² 的峰值亮度（HDR 内容）。但是，即使在显示明暗均匀分布的区域（APL18）时，Fold6 也能达到同样高的亮度（2,724 cd/m²）。
两款显示器均采用 LTPO 面板，刷新率可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间调节。由于屏幕使用的是 OLED 技术，它们都使用脉宽调制来控制亮度。我们使用 Rigol 软件（自动）测得的屏幕闪烁频率为 120 Hz，这可能是由于 BFI（黑框插入）造成的。我们手动测量的结果是频率为 480 Hz。用示波器测量到的 PWM 是均匀的，振幅也相当平缓，略高于 16%。
1461cd/m²1462cd/m²1449cd/m²1398cd/m²1396cd/m²1393cd/m²1307cd/m²1314cd/m²1305cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1462 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1387.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.08 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %Center on Battery: 1396 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.16CCT: 6495 K
Foldable display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"Vivo X Fold3AMOLED, 2480x2200, 8"Honor Magic V2 RSROLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"Xiaomi Mix Fold 3AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8"Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"Screen21%10%12%-47%Brightness middle (cd/m²)13961793 28%961 -31%1307 -6%1104 -21%Brightness (cd/m²)13871806 30%950 -32%1308 -6%1107 -20%Brightness Distribution (%)8999 11%97 9%96 8%97 9%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.70.9 47%0.8 53%1 41%3.1 -82%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.52.1 16%1.5 40%1.7 32%4.2 -68%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.51.6 -7%1.2 20%1.5 -0%3 -100%Gamma2.16 102%2.2 100%2.23 99%2.24 98%2.01 109%CCT6495 100%6595 99%6396 102%6313 103%6594 99%* ... smaller is better
前面板的子像素阵列6.3 英寸动态盖板显示屏不仅比 Fold5 稍大，而且采用了更宽的 22.1:9 宽高比。其峰值亮度与内屏相当（APL18：2,623 cd/m²，HDR：2,649 cd/m²）。
Outer display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6AMOLED, 2376x968, 6.3"Vivo X Fold32748x1172, 6.5"Honor Magic V2 RSROLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"Xiaomi Mix Fold 3AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.6"Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Dynamic AMOLED, 2316x904, 6.2"ScreenBrightness middle (cd/m²)1363158010931020957Brightness (cd/m²)1369158510871065958Brightness Distribution (%)9494968497Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.31.51.40.92.3Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *4.54.14.124Greyscale dE 2000 *2.33.42.71.22Gamma2.06 107%2.38 92%2.21 100%2.26 97%2.02 109%CCT6633 98%6700 97%6412 101%6436 101%6465 101%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 HzAmplitude: 16.45 %The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8215 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（封面显示；最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和光分光计检查了屏幕的色彩校准。两块屏幕的色彩偏差大致在目标范围内（<3），不过我们测量的主屏幕的 DeltaE 值总体较低。
前置显示器色彩精度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
前置显示屏色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
前置灰度显示屏（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
前置显示屏色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
内部显示色彩精度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
内部显示色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度内部显示（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
内部显示屏色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.986 ms rise↘ 0.884 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey3.15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.46 ms rise↘ 1.69 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).
在户外，Fold6 的两块显示屏都给人留下了非常深刻的印象--即使是在炎炎夏日。面板的视角稳定性也非常好。
性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的Galaxy Z Fold6骁龙 8 Snapdragon 8 Gen.GalaxyFold6 配备了 12GB DDR5x 内存和 512GB UFS 4.0 存储空间，在我们的基准测试中表现出色。与 Galaxy S24 Ultra相比，分数略低。Fold6 的 UFS 4.0 存储器在写入小数据块时明显较弱。
Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2239 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (2072 - 2287, n=3)
2199 Points -2%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2098 Points -6%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2084 Points -7%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2014 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1999 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3803, n=202, last 2 years)
1704 Points -24% Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6894 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (6354 - 7102, n=3)
6783 Points -2%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5765 Points -16%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5525 Points -20%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5425 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5384 Points -22%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=202, last 2 years)
4980 Points -28%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points +9%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1685774 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (1492419 - 1837994, n=3)
1672062 Points -1%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1575328 Points -7%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1562239 Points -7%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1493877 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=147, last 2 years)
1405736 Points -17%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (18026 - 18672, n=3)
18273 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18026 Points Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17279 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16311 Points -10%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15761 Points -13%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=184, last 2 years)
14559 Points -19%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14187 Points -21%CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1473 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (1443 - 1473, n=3)
1453 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points -2%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1262 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1253 Points -15%Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=129, last 2 years)
1087 Points -26%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1083 Points -26%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points -100%BaseMark OS II
OverallXiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9730 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9555 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (9267 - 9696, n=3)
9506 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9337 Points -2%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9126 Points -4%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8798 Points -8%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=144, last 2 years)
7389 Points -23% SystemSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +9%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (15087 - 16475, n=3)
15721 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15087 Points Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14345 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14032 Points -7%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13749 Points -9%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11987 Points -21%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=144, last 2 years)
11107 Points -26% MemorySamsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points +15%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10136 Points +12%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10051 Points +11%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (9073 - 10389, n=3)
9564 Points +5%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9455 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9073 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8467 Points -7%Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=144, last 2 years)
8382 Points -8% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
32352 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32002 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31928 Points -1%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (26269 - 32352, n=3)
28842 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -14%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
26528 Points -18%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
25822 Points -20%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=144, last 2 years)
24540 Points -24% WebSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2032 Points +8%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2009 Points +7%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1987 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1882 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (1815 - 1950, n=3)
1882 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -4%Honor Magic V2 RSRQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1814 Points -4%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=144, last 2 years)
1667 Points -11%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=135, last 2 years)
19717 Points +11%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
17812 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (15793 - 18852, n=3)
17486 Points -2%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15942 Points -10%Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14837 Points -17%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1267 Points -93%AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (1518 - 239813, n=3)
88473 Points +267%Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=123, last 2 years)
27610 Points +15%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
24087 Points Vivo X Fold3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17412 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -94%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1199 Points -95%Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPUSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1317 Points +2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (1288 - 1317, n=2)
1303 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1288 Points Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=33, last 2 years)
819 Points -36% 0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPUSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1308 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (1254 - 1308, n=2)
1281 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1254 Points -4%Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=32, last 2 years)
733 Points -44% 0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPISamsung Galaxy S24 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
678 Points +13%Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=28, last 2 years)
649 Points +9%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (598 - 678, n=2)
638 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
598 Points
钛 Adreno 750在我们的图形测试中，Adreno 750 的表现非常出色，但遗憾的是，它在完成任务时却拉了手刹。Fold6 在 GFXBench 和 3DMark 测试中的得分有时与三星 Galaxy S24 Ultra在 GFXBench 和 3DMark 测试中，Fold6 的成绩有时与三星 S24 Ultra 不相上下，但在大多数情况下，它的成绩要低得多--尽管可折叠手机只需计算其主显示屏上略低的像素数。后续机型的图形性能也仅部分优于 折叠5.
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4693 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3892 Points -17%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3800 Points -19%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3721 Points -21%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3708 Points -21%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points +25%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4021 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3928 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3901 Points -3%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3740 Points -7%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points -8%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18726 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14671 Points -22%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14599 Points -22%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
14107 Points -25%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13789 Points -26%3DMark / Wild Life Score
Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13896 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points 3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7290 Points Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5380 Points -26%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5273 Points -28%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points +15%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7487 Points Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5356 Points -28%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5289 Points -29%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +38%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +26%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
487 fps +22%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
398 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
329 fps -17%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps -23%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +13%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
322 fps +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
288 fps -4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps -45%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -41%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps +5%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
236 fps Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps -6%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
213 fps -10%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -53%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -7%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -25%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -40%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps +17%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps +12%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps +6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -34%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps -3%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -6%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps -30%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -34%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -5%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps -12%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -17%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -21%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -48%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +41%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps -5%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -16%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -25%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps +41%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +18%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +15%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -6%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
96 fps -28%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +48%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +15%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +15%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
18 fps -33%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1629 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1503 Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points +30%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1386 Points
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
188.652 Points +21%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (155.8 - 210, n=3)
177.6 Points +14%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
157.504 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
155.837 Points Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=148, last 2 years)
152.9 Points -2%Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
140.367 Points -10%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (237 - 281, n=3)
261 runs/min +10%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
237 runs/min Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=130, last 2 years)
208 runs/min -12%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
199 runs/min -16%Vivo X Fold3
182 runs/min -23%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
211 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (181 - 211, n=3)
195.7 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
185 Points -12%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
183 Points -13%Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
158 Points -25%Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=143, last 2 years)
143.6 Points -32%WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
238 Points +24%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (192 - 218, n=2)
205 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrome 127)
192 Points Average of class Smartphone (38 - 380, n=42, last 2 years)
171.5 Points -11%Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (66754 - 72835, n=3)
70533 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
66754 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
65418 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
60317 Points -10%Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
49893 Points -25%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=196, last 2 years)
47449 Points -29%Honor Magic V2 RSR (Chrome 121)
44542 Points -33%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years)
1210 ms * -118%Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
787.4 ms * -42%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
693.3 ms * -25%Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
653.8 ms * -18%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (555 - 599, n=3)
576 ms * -4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
554.57 ms * * ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Vivo X Fold3Honor Magic V2 RSRXiaomi Mix Fold 3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5249%298%258%74%236%139% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)4115.343556.73 -14%3359.31 -18%3572.73 -13%4384.43 7%3675 ?(1851 - 4512, n=48) -11%2216 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) -46% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)2083.253076.11 48%3399.45 63%2897.27 39%2449.23 18%3072 ?(1494 - 4030, n=48) 47%1821 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=185, last 2 years) -13% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)398.01387.96 -3%416.98 5%389.81 -2%459.94 16%382 ?(250 - 504, n=48) -4%295 ?(47.6 - 504, n=185, last 2 years) -26% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)45.73486.21 963%568.29 1143%506.41 1007%161.39 253%463 ?(45.7 - 964, n=48) 912%339 ?(9.4 - 964, n=185, last 2 years) 641%
游戏 -Galaxy Z Fold6 可达到 120 帧/秒我们使用GameBench 应用程序来了解游戏在测试设备上运行的流畅度，以及 HFR 游戏的可能性。在记录过程中，Fold6 达到了最高 120fps。我们测试的Android 游戏全部运行流畅，没有任何明显的异常。
死亡扳机 2
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6; Dead Trigger 2: Ø59.6 (56-60) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6; Genshin Impact: Ø50.7 (38-60) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø117.5 (87-121) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.3 (33-60) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (34-41)
排放物 - 三星手机温度超高温度在我们的测量过程中，手机表面温度变化很大，Fold6 的最高温度甚至超过了 50 摄氏度。
根据三星的说法，它的蒸气腔冷却系统比上一代产品扩大了 前代产品但这只是略微改善了手机在日常使用中的节流问题。我们测得的热引起的性能下降约为 25% 至 40%。我们测量了 Snapdragon 8 Gen.Galaxy使用 3DMark 压力测试。
Max. LoadIdle
50.8 °C48.3 °C47.7 °C 48.6 °C45.7 °C44 °C 36.2 °C36.3 °C36.3 °C
Maximum: 50.8 °CAverage: 43.8 °C
47.6 °C48 °C51 °C41.7 °C48.3 °C49.4 °C34.5 °C34.9 °C34.5 °C
Maximum: 51 °CAverage: 43.3 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
26.2 °C26.5 °C26 °C 26.6 °C26.8 °C26.4 °C 26.7 °C26.7 °C26.2 °C
Maximum: 26.8 °CAverage: 26.5 °C
25.3 °C25.5 °C25.7 °C25.6 °C26 °C25.8 °C26 °C26.1 °C25.8 °C
Maximum: 26.1 °CAverage: 25.8 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityXiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.9 % +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.9 % -11%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.7 % -19%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.4 % -44% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestXiaomi Mix Fold 3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.2 % +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.9 % Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % -13%Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.4 % -14%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
45.8 % -40% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.7 % Vivo X Fold3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % -17%Honor Magic V2 RSRAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
33.2 % -52% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.5 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.9 (19.3-25.1) Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.6 (11.4-17.2) Honor Magic V2 RSR Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.4 (10.3-22.5) Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.5 (18.5-23.1) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø17.2 (15.6-23.3) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.6 (65.2-97) Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø53.6 (43.2-79.1) Honor Magic V2 RSR Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø55.4 (30-80) Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.5 (61.2-83.9) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.3 (50.1-83.6) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø80.8 (69.3-118.6) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø20.4 (18.8-28.2) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.1) Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.5 (9.94-17.2) Honor Magic V2 RSR Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.9 (5.8-17.5) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.5 (9-12.8)
发言人Fold6 依靠两个扬声器为智能手机提供出色的立体声音效。虽然可折叠手机的音效没有很大的深度，但其低音却比较清晰。粉红噪声 "还显示出中高音的线性频率响应，只有超级高音扬声器会出现破音。如果要对外输出声音，可以使用设备的有线 USB 连接或无线蓝牙 5.3。不过，后者使用的编解码器范围有限（SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC、SCC、LDAC、AAC）。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 -Galaxy Z Fold6 充电功率仅为 25 瓦特耗电量Fold6 配有大尺寸主屏幕，耗电量相当不错。 Fold5在闲置模式下更省电一些。使用该公司自己的有线 "超级快速充电 "技术，它的电池充电功率仍然只有 25 瓦，无线充电功率只有 15 瓦。充电时间约为 90 分钟。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.02 / 0.11 WattIdle 0.83 / 1.3 / 1.44 Watt
Load
13.57 / 16.03 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold64400 mAhVivo X Fold35500 mAhHonor Magic V2 RSR5000 mAhXiaomi Mix Fold 34800 mAhSamsung Galaxy Z Fold54400 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption6%-19%3%32%11%11%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.830.91 -10%1.31 -58%0.86 -4%0.55 34%0.69 ?(0.51 - 0.83, n=3) 17%0.859 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=152, last 2 years) -3%Idle Average * (Watt)1.31.61 -24%1.99 -53%1.05 19%0.9 31%1.233 ?(1.18 - 1.3, n=3) 5%1.424 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=152, last 2 years) -10%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.441.7 -18%2.15 -49%1.07 26%1 31%1.33 ?(1.21 - 1.44, n=3) 8%1.597 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=152, last 2 years) -11%Load Average * (Watt)13.576.36 53%8.92 34%15.27 -13%9.58 29%12.1 ?(6.23 - 16.5, n=3) 11%7.22 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=134, last 2 years) 47%Load Maximum * (Watt)16.0311.26 30%11.05 31%17.78 -11%10.74 33%13.5 ?(8.01 - 16.6, n=3) 16%11.1 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=134, last 2 years) 31%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.16 (0.899-16) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (1.023-13.7) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.932 (0.885-1.149) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.8 (3.56-6.57) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.01-13.1) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.932 (0.885-1.149) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)
运行时间遗憾的是，三星手机的电池容量与其前代产品相比并没有增长 前代电池容量仍然只有 4,400 毫安时。在我们进行的 WLAN 电池实际测试中，我们将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m²，在使用 7.6 英寸 OLED 显示屏的情况下，我们仍然测得了 913 分钟的良好运行时间。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 127)
15h 13min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold64400 mAh
15.2 h Vivo X Fold35500 mAh
12.6 h Honor Magic V2 RSR5000 mAh
12.4 h Xiaomi Mix Fold 34800 mAh
15.4 h Samsung Galaxy Z Fold54400 mAh
12.7 h
Pros+ 非常明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 支持输入笔
+ 精确的定位服务
+ 更新周期长
+ 高质量外壳，符合 IP 防护等级Cons- 充电慢温度较高
- 温度较高
- 无 Wifi 7
三星Galaxy Z Fold6 的评价 三星Galaxy Z Fold6 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供作为可折叠智能手机领域的先驱，它的 Fold 系列似乎在中国竞争对手面前失去了一些优势，因为它的改进非常有限。第六代 Fold 更轻、更薄，但其他可折叠手机，如 vivo X Fold3等其他可折叠手机在这方面则完全不同。更好的 更好的版本在撰写本文时，Fold 6 的更好版本已经在起步阶段。
Galaxy Z Fold6 在日常使用中成功地掩盖了自己的缺点。
得益于较长的更新时间和强大的功能，Galaxy Z Fold6 仍然是可折叠智能手机中一个有趣的选择--尤其是因为它集成了谷歌的独家服务和可选的 S Pen。然而，对于这样一款高价产品，我们并不十分清楚为何不将其纳入手机的供货范围。
真正能替代 Fold6 的产品少之又少。不过 Honor Magic V2及其 继任者是两款功能强大的 XXL 替代产品。
价格和供应情况Galaxy Z Fold6 的 512GB 版本目前在亚马逊上的售价为1,646.97 美元。
请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
- 08/16/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis91%
Keyboard70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device96%
Connectivity64 / 69 → 93%
Weight87%
Battery90%
Display92%
Games Performance37 / 55 → 67%
Application Performance75 / 85 → 88%
AI Performance58%
Temperature85%
Noise100%
Audio77 / 90 → 85%
Camera82%
Average75%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials70%Packaging80%Power Use98.3%Repairability60%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 68.1%
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Galaxy Z Fold6 Series)News•爆料者就三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 显示屏下摄像头... |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold SE 与Galaxy Z F... |News•Galaxy Z Fold 6 存在油漆问题：三星警告不要使... |News•三星Galaxy Z Flip6：更坚固，折痕更少。 Gal... |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold6 FE 取消：预计 2024... |News•三星Galaxy Unpacked：Galaxy Z Fol... |News•第一条具体线索浮出水面后，三星Galaxy Z Fold6 ... |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold6 和Galaxy Z Fli...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 461 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 634699 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!